<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The &#34;C&#34; Branch &#187; Computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecbranch.com/category/technology/computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecbranch.com</link>
	<description>Chris DeMarco&#039;s Blog and Internet Sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Whole &#8220;Laptop Hunters&#8221; Premise is Just Stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/08/03/whole-laptop-hunters-premise-just-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/08/03/whole-laptop-hunters-premise-just-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop hunter ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop hunters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop hunters ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop hunters commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop hunters is stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft laptop hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chances are you've seen one of the "Laptop Hunters" commercials Microsoft has been pushing on TV and the internet.  Here's why the premise of these ads is just plain stupid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F08%2F03%2Fwhole-laptop-hunters-premise-just-stupid%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F08%2F03%2Fwhole-laptop-hunters-premise-just-stupid%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>This &#8220;Laptop Hunters&#8221; ordeal has been going on way too long for me to have not shared my two cents yet, so here goes&#8230;</p>
<p>Chances are you&#8217;ve seen one of the &#8220;Laptop Hunters&#8221; commercials Microsoft has been pushing on TV and the internet, but in case you haven&#8217;t, I&#8217;ll do a quick overview of the original premise.  A girl &#8211; Lauren (later a second Lauren, Sheila, a Mom who&#8217;s returning to law school, and others join the fray) &#8211; goes computer shopping with a budget of $1000 or less, looking for a 17&#8243; laptop with speed and an adjustable keyboard (still not sure exactly what that is) &#8211; and Microsoft tags along.  They promise to buy her whichever computer she finds meeting that criteria, to prove that the only practical computer for an average American on a budget is, of course, a PC with Microsoft Windows.</p>
<p><center><embed src="http://images.video.msn.com/flash/soapbox1_1.swf" width="432" height="364" id="fh4bhage" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" flashvars="player.c=v&#038;player.v=0bb6a07c-c829-4562-8375-49e6693810c7&#038;mkt=en-US&#038;ifs=true&#038;fr=shared"></embed><noembed><a href="http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-US&#038;playlist=videoByUuids:uuids:0bb6a07c-c829-4562-8375-49e6693810c7&#038;showPlaylist=true&#038;from=shared" target="_new" title="Laptop Hunters $1000 â€“ Lauren Gets an HP Pavilion">Video: Laptop Hunters $1000 â€“ Lauren Gets an HP Pavilion</a></noembed></center><br />
<br clear="all"><br />
A couple things pop out in the original video that leave me shaking my head, so I&#8217;ll first discuss those, and then we&#8217;ll take a look at some <strong>real facts</strong> about pricing and other important factors when buying computers.</p>
<ol>
<li>Lauren is supposedly some random person off the street who&#8217;s buying a computer, yet she really seems like an actress, possibly even a paid actress, to me.  Mind, I guess they could have tried filming the commercial with 250 different people before they finally found someone as great on camera as she was, but the whole thing just seemed a bit too nicely done to be an on-the-fly thing with someone off the street (especially considering that the producer has consistently produced garbage software after having years to polish and perfect it).</li>
<li>Near the very beginning of the video, Lauren spends about 6 seconds in the Apple store (she calls it the &#8220;Mac store&#8221;) to decide she&#8217;s &#8220;not cool enough for a Mac.&#8221;  I find it intriguing that Microsoft is going to pull that &#8220;prestige&#8221; stereotype nonsense about Apple users.  I wonder how Microsoft would like it if I made a commercial portraying Windows users as idiots who don&#8217;t know enough about computers to realize what constitutes a decent, stable operating system.  Oh wait, at least mine would be about 100 times closer to truth then their lousy stereotype (sorry Windows users).</li>
<li>Microsoft emphasizes the factor of price heavily in their equation, but only takes into account the initial cost of the computer.  But since that seems oddly presumptuous to me, let&#8217;s be realistic and say that Lauren were to keep her new laptop for 5 years (a fair assumption considering she was on a budget in the first place).  First off, it will no doubt have a ton of bloatware preloaded onto it, which stores like Office Depot and BestBuy offer a removal service for around $40-60.  If she leaves it on, it will only slow it down and cause problems down the road, thus making the need for future repairs even more likely.<br />
<br clear="all"><br />
Of course, her Microsoft Windows laptop is going to require an Antivirus/security subscription among other things down the road, beyond the initial cost of the machine.  And, considering that it&#8217;s running Windows, it will probably need to be formatted and reinstalled at least once during that five years, almost definitely more if she doesn&#8217;t properly handle the previous security software investment.</p>
<p>
So let&#8217;s say Lauren gets an Antivirus (like she would need to, even according to Microsoft) for we&#8217;ll say $30/year, and handles installing it herself.  That adds $150 to the cost of the computer over the next 5 years.  A Mac, of course, would not require this OR come with bloatware, and would still remain at its initial cost at this point.</p>
<p>Further, based on my experience working on and repairing Microsoft Windows computers, chances are she&#8217;s going to need to have some work done on it (either a good cleanup and virus removal or a full-blown erase and reinstall) which could cost her much more than $100, but we&#8217;ll stay conservative and go with only that amount.</p>
<p>Now the cost of her $699 computer has increased by $50 for removing the bloatware, $150 for her security subscription and another $100 for the repairs it will no doubt require, bringing it to a much more realistic $999 and hovering over her $1000 budget after sales tax (and hovering substantially higher in certain states).</li>
<li>Lastly regarding this video, at the very end Lauren claims, &#8220;I&#8217;m a PC, and I got just what I wanted.&#8221;  And I guess if what she wanted was a cheaply-made machine with system software highly prone to security exploits and virus infection, she most certainly did get what she wanted.  But, chances are of course, that she probably didn&#8217;t.</li>
</ol>
<p> Following the release of these commercials by Microsoft, Apple got upset and asked a Microsoft executive to stop airing them, which was stupid given that Apple has not only been airing &#8220;Mac vs. PC&#8221; commercials for quite some time but also released some that have been considered rebuttals to &#8220;Laptop Hunters.&#8221;</p>
<p>For example, this one:<br />
<Center><br />
<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fZRcYS88BwQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fZRcYS88BwQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object><br />
</center><br />
<br clear="all"><br />
So, to conclude, I will share my general, <strong>objective</strong> thoughts on why this whole &#8220;Laptop Hunters&#8221; premise is plain stupid and what factors are realistic in choosing a good computer.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Price Tag</strong> &#8211; The ongoing Mac vs. PC debate is not about prestige, and that was a low blow by Microsoft.  It&#8217;s no question that Apple&#8217;s products cost much more, yes.  But that comes with the fact that they are simply designed with much better quality every step of the way &#8211; not to function as some sort of prestige or &#8220;coolness&#8221; icon.  From my work on the insides of both PC and Apple laptops, it&#8217;s obvious to me that with their solid construction and smart features like the rubber-mounted hard drive rack, the construction of Apple laptops is in general FAR superior than virtually all of the low-cost PC laptop manufacturers.</li>
<li><strong>Software Production Fail</strong> &#8211; Setting aside the Mac vs. PC debate for a moment, understanding the disadvantages in construction among cheap PC manufacturers, let&#8217;s talk software.  Including Linux and other much more solid and reliable operating systems alternative to Microsoft Windows, it&#8217;s very apparent that Microsoft is at the very bottom of the totem pole.  If I had the time and resources, <strong><em>I</em></strong> could probably gather a few of my buddies and write an OS that gets less viruses &#8211; from a basement somewhere.  Microsoft <em>has</em> to be aware of this and knows darn well that these laptops running their software that these people are buying are vulnerable, insecure, and require third-party software to protect them since Microsoft can&#8217;t handle that itself (which tacks on to the computer&#8217;s price).</li>
<li><strong>Attacking Each Other Fails</strong> &#8211; As I implied earlier, it was dumb for Apple to try and have Microsoft remove the commercials given all the sliming they themselves have doing to Microsoft.  However, it was dumber for Microsoft to make the misleading ADs, especially when they&#8217;re failing miserably at producing a decent operating system and are currently still subjecting people to using arguably their worst OS ever.</li>
<li><strong>Facts Work Better</strong> &#8211; Though my natural inclination towards Apple products was no doubt detectable, it was all based on facts that I clearly stated throughout this article.  Rather than trying to &#8220;slime&#8221; each other and produce misleading advertisements, the computer companies should simply declare facts and let people make their decisions based on them (admittedly, Apple has done this well in many of their commercials, though perhaps not as tactfully as possible).</li>
</ol>
<p>So to summarize the facts:</p>
<ul>
<li>Apple computers cost substantially more than their PC counterparts, but for several good reasons (as follow).</li>
<li>The construction and assembly of Apple computers is by far superior to that of PC laptops within the price ranges shown on Microsoft&#8217;s commercials</li>
<li>A laptop running Windows will require additional investments out of the box, including Antivirus software ($150 across 5 years), bloatware removal ($50 on average), and repairs/virus removal down the road ($100 is <em>extremely</em> conservative).
<li>Apple computers and even PC hardware running Linux or other OS&#8217;es based on Unix are much more stable and do not require the additional security solutions and investments mentioned above that Microsoft-using computers do.</li>
</ul>
<p>Well, there you have it.  Objective facts and information on the differences between Macs and PCs, based on the material in Microsoft&#8217;s recent &#8220;Laptop Hunters&#8221; commercials.  Now you can make your own decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/08/03/whole-laptop-hunters-premise-just-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best Alternative To 1&amp;1</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/07/16/the-best-alternative-to-1andd1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/07/16/the-best-alternative-to-1andd1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain registrar reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain registrars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netfirms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
In the past, I&#8217;ve written about my 1&#038;1 Internet woes, from their horrible customer support to their lousy quality services to the incredible delays that happen whenever you try to make changes to your domains.  In a nutshell, 1&#038;1 is perhaps one of the worst domain registrars ever.
I&#8217;m very excited, however, to have found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F07%2F16%2Fthe-best-alternative-to-1andd1%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F07%2F16%2Fthe-best-alternative-to-1andd1%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>In the past, I&#8217;ve written about my 1&#038;1 Internet woes, from their horrible customer support to their lousy quality services to the incredible delays that happen whenever you try to make changes to your domains.  In a nutshell, 1&#038;1 is perhaps one of the worst domain registrars ever.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very excited, however, to have found an outstanding (and better value) alternative to 1&#038;1.  It&#8217;s called <a href="http://www.kqzyfj.com/click-3328198-10414046" target="_blank" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.netfirms.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">Netfirms</a> and it&#8217;s very impressive!  Domains are regularly priced at $6.95 (much cheaper than 1&#038;1, especially since they&#8217;ve been raising their prices) but I even got $1 off on my first domain.  Plus, the registration and updates happen almost instantly, unlike 1&#038;1 which makes you wait sometimes even days for the updates to finally happen.</p>
<p>You can read more at my review of them on Top Product Reports <a href="http://www.topproductreports.com/internet/netfirms-domain-registration-review/">here</a> or just hop over and get started at <a href="http://www.kqzyfj.com/click-3328198-10414046" target="_blank" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.netfirms.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">Netfirms</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/07/16/the-best-alternative-to-1andd1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yet Another Reason to Avoid Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/07/09/yet-another-reason-to-avoid-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/07/09/yet-another-reason-to-avoid-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/07/09/yet-another-reason-to-avoid-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Research is now showing that a security vulnerability in Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer browser that the company has been scrambling over in the past few days was actually discovered nearly 2 years ago.  
Microsoft, of course, has just how decided to do something about it, and is claiming that two of their researchers just discovered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F07%2F09%2Fyet-another-reason-to-avoid-microsoft%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F07%2F09%2Fyet-another-reason-to-avoid-microsoft%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Research is now showing that a security vulnerability in Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer browser that the company has been scrambling over in the past few days was actually discovered nearly 2 years ago.  </p>
<p>Microsoft, of course, has just how decided to do something about it, and is claiming that two of their researchers just discovered it.  The vulnerability has been being exploited substantially for the past month.</p>
<p>Read more at ComputerWorld here: <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135259/Microsoft_may_have_known_about_critical_IE_bug_for_months">http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135259/Microsoft_may_have_known_about_critical_IE_bug_for_months</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/07/09/yet-another-reason-to-avoid-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to Produce a Full Chrome OS</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/07/08/google-to-produce-a-full-chrome-os/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/07/08/google-to-produce-a-full-chrome-os/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft windows alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows alternative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Now this has got me quite excited.  It seems that after the great success Google has had with its Chrome browser, the internet giant will run even further ahead with its already remarkable success and turn Chrome into an entire operating system.
Reading on the Official Google Blog, the operating system will be designed specifically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F07%2F08%2Fgoogle-to-produce-a-full-chrome-os%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F07%2F08%2Fgoogle-to-produce-a-full-chrome-os%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Now this has got me quite excited.  It seems that after the great success Google has had with its Chrome browser, the internet giant will run even further ahead with its already remarkable success and turn Chrome into an entire operating system.</p>
<p>Reading on the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com">Official Google Blog</a>, the operating system will be designed specifically for the &#8220;web era,&#8221; with features and operation intended to ease and simplify using internet resources directly within the OS.  It will run on both x86 as well as the ARM architecture, meaning that you would be able to install it right on your desktop or laptop PC just like a copy of Windows or Linux.<br />
<span id="more-236"></span><br />
Perhaps the most exciting part are the projected release dates.  Google intends to have source code available later this year, and actually have computers for sale with the OS in the second half of 2010, only about a year away.  That&#8217;s exciting!</p>
<p>Given Google&#8217;s great success with the Chrome browser (around 30 million people use it regularly) and traack record of great, reliable products, it will be interesting to watch this project progress.</p>
<p>For more information, read the article on the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html">Official Google Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/07/08/google-to-produce-a-full-chrome-os/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Everything Was Made By Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/05/05/if-everything-was-made-by-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/05/05/if-everything-was-made-by-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		

Apparently Cracked.com recently had a contest to see who could make the best photo of how things would look if Microsoft had in fact taken over the world (like it appeared they might back in the 90s).  In fact, I can remember reading a newspaper article about a kitchen controlled entirely by Microsoft-driven computers. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F05%2F05%2Fif-everything-was-made-by-microsoft%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F05%2F05%2Fif-everything-was-made-by-microsoft%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img alt="Microsoft Wedding Album" src="http://images.thecbranch.com/microsoft_weddingalbum.jpg"><br clear="all"><br />
Apparently <a href="http://www.cracked.com">Cracked.com</a> recently had a contest to see who could make the best photo of how things would look if Microsoft had in fact taken over the world (like it appeared they might back in the 90s).  In fact, I can remember reading a newspaper article about a kitchen controlled entirely by Microsoft-driven computers.  For example, the refrigerator had a built-in computer terminal with a touch screen for accessing recipe databases and even maintaining inventory of its contents.</p>
<p>Fortunately, given their last several product releases, it doesn&#8217;t appear that there&#8217;s any chance of Microsoft taking over much of anything&#8230;which makes ridiculing them all the more funny!  </p>
<p>Check this out: <a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_17323_if-everything-was-made-by-microsoft.html">If Everything Was Made By Microsoft</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/05/05/if-everything-was-made-by-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing StupidError.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/04/21/stupid-error-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/04/21/stupid-error-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monday Snicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error screenshot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glitches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid error]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Remember way back when there was a &#8220;Funny Errors and Glitches&#8221; section on The &#8220;C&#8221; Branch, or even the old CDeMar22?  Well, I came across some archives the other day and decided that would be a great idea to bring back and turn into a new site.
Head on over to www.StupidError.com to check out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F04%2F21%2Fstupid-error-com%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F04%2F21%2Fstupid-error-com%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Remember way back when there was a &#8220;Funny Errors and Glitches&#8221; section on <a href="http://www.thecbranch.com/">The &#8220;C&#8221; Branch</a>, or even the old CDeMar22?  Well, I came across some archives the other day and decided that would be a great idea to bring back and turn into a new site.</p>
<p>Head on over to <a href="http://www.stupiderror.com">www.StupidError.com</a> to check out our totally awesome, all-new Errors and Glitches website.  </p>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget to submit your funniest error screens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/04/21/stupid-error-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proof That Windows Solitaire is Rigged</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/04/17/proof-that-windows-solitaire-is-rigged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/04/17/proof-that-windows-solitaire-is-rigged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft glitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rigged solitaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solitaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solitaire cheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solitaire is rigged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solitare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
It&#8217;s things like this that prove that Microsoft doesn&#8217;t want you to win at Solitaire&#8230;or at least not easily.  See if you can spot why&#8230;
Click thumbnail to expand.


Note:  This is not shopped.  It actually really happened to me.  Seriously.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F04%2F17%2Fproof-that-windows-solitaire-is-rigged%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F04%2F17%2Fproof-that-windows-solitaire-is-rigged%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>It&#8217;s things like this that prove that Microsoft doesn&#8217;t want you to win at Solitaire&#8230;or at least not easily.  See if you can spot why&#8230;</p>
<p>Click thumbnail to expand.</p>
<p><center><a target="blank" href="http://images.thecbranch.com/errors/2kingshearts.jpg"><img src="http://images.thecbranch.com/errors/2kingshearts_tn.jpg" alt="2 Kings of Hearts in Windows Solitaire" /></a></center><br />
<br clear="all"><br />
Note:  This is not shopped.  It actually really happened to me.  Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/04/17/proof-that-windows-solitaire-is-rigged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recover Your Contacts After a &#8220;New Shopping New Life!&#8221; Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/31/recover-your-contacts-after-new-shopping-new-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/31/recover-your-contacts-after-new-shopping-new-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deleted contacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email contacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new shopping new life virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Shopping New Life!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Many people who have experienced the aftermath of the &#8220;New Shopping New Life!&#8221; email attack have found all their email contacts missing as well.  So, to recover your contacts after an attack of the &#8220;New Shopping New Life!&#8221; virus hacker bot thing, here&#8217;s what you&#8217;ll need to do.

First, you will need to contact your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F03%2F31%2Frecover-your-contacts-after-new-shopping-new-life%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F03%2F31%2Frecover-your-contacts-after-new-shopping-new-life%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Many people who have experienced the aftermath of the &#8220;New Shopping New Life!&#8221; email attack have found all their email contacts missing as well.  So, to recover your contacts after an attack of the &#8220;New Shopping New Life!&#8221; virus hacker bot thing, here&#8217;s what you&#8217;ll need to do.</p>
<ul>
<li>First, you will need to contact your mail provider.  Let them know that your account was compromised and that you have changed your password.  If Yahoo! is your email provider, call them at this number: 1-866-562-7219.</li>
<li>If you are unable to remove the vacation autoresponders set by the hacker bot, notify your provider and have them help you with this.  Otherwise, inform them that you have already done this.</li>
<li>Tell them that you have lost all your email contacts.  They will ask you for a handful of contacts you know were in your list.  Tell them these contacts.</li>
<li>They will do their best to look through their backups from before the bot attacked your account and recover your contacts.
</li>
</ul>
<p>Hopefully this helps.  Also, don&#8217;t forget to get your computer checked out for viruses, spyware and malware.  If you live in Michigan, contact <a href="http://www.strellix.com">Strellix Computer Repair</a> for quality computer service.  Best of luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/31/recover-your-contacts-after-new-shopping-new-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T &#8211; Possibly the Worst Company Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/25/att-possibly-the-worst-company-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/25/att-possibly-the-worst-company-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t is the worst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t nightmares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t worst company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t worst ever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att nightmare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att terrible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att worst co ever]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
AT&#038;T is the worst company ever. Not sure how that &#8220;possibly&#8221; got in there&#8230;
If I was to add up all the time I&#8217;ve wasted dealing with AT&#038;T Customer Support, I imagine it would constitute a fairly significant percentage of my life.  The worst part is that all of the issues I&#8217;ve experienced are embarrassingly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F03%2F25%2Fatt-possibly-the-worst-company-ever%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F03%2F25%2Fatt-possibly-the-worst-company-ever%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<h2>AT&#038;T <i>is</i> the worst company ever. <br />Not sure how that &#8220;possibly&#8221; got in there&#8230;</h2>
<p>If I was to add up all the time I&#8217;ve wasted dealing with AT&#038;T Customer Support, I imagine it would constitute a fairly significant percentage of my life.  The worst part is that all of the issues I&#8217;ve experienced are embarrassingly pathetic on their part and should never have happened if AT&#038;T was truly a legit and reliable company.</p>
<p>About four months ago, I decided to sign up for AT&#038;T DSL in my home.  The company offers a &#8220;standalone&#8221; package that does not require a home phone line and simply provides an internet connection.  Since I utilize a VOIP line and an AT&#038;T cell phone for my phone lines (actually an iPhone at the time I signed up), this sort of package made perfect sense for my needs. <span id="more-144"></span><br />
<BR clear="all"></p>
<p>So, here&#8217;s how I saw this playing out:</p>
<ol>
<li>I visit the AT&#038;T website, enter my address and personal information, decline the set-up kit since I already have a modem, and they activate DSL on my line within a day or two tops.</li>
<li>They add my internet connection to my existing bill and synchronize it with the auto-pay I already had set up.</li>
</ol>
<p>Of course, if you&#8217;ve ever dealt with AT&#038;T before and know what kind of nightmare it is, you&#8217;re already well aware that what actually happened was in fact nothing remotely close to that.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what actually happened.</p>
<ol>
<li>I visit the AT&#038;T website.  I have to hunt for the package I want because they don&#8217;t like the idea of people paying only for internet without handing them an extra $35 a month for phone service too.</li>
<li>I finally find the plan I want and begin the signup process.  However, AT&#038;T claims my address doesn&#8217;t exist.
</li>
<li>After checking to make sure my home still exists (since I was at a friend&#8217;s house to use her internet), I call AT&#038;T to see what the deal is. </li>
<li>As always, AT&#038;T transfers you to at least 5 different people during the course of one phone call.</li>
<li>Two and a half hours later, I am so infuriated that I am seriously debating giving up and paying a little more to go with a different company.  However, about 2.5 hours in, AT&#038;T finally agrees that my address does in fact exist.</li>
<li>I raise hell about the past two hours and the best they can offer me is a month of the service free if I decide to continue.  Even though I think it&#8217;s a pretty cheap apology, I take the offer anyways.
<li>AT&#038;T tries to nail me with a 1 year contract.  I tell them no way after the quality of service I&#8217;ve experienced for the past two and a half hours, and that I will just find another company because there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;m committing to a year of this torture.</li>
<li>They agree to let me go month-to-month.  I finally convince the idiot on the phone that I am not stupid and do know what a DSL modem is, and that I do in fact have one already.  They finally sign me up.</li>
<li>The representative tells me that, essentially because I am not signing up for a phone line along with my internet, I&#8217;ll need to wait over a week to get my internet line active.</li>
<li>I tell them this is unacceptable and spend the next hour being bounced back and forth and trying to locate their consumer relations department, which apparently does not exist.
</li>
<li>After three and a half hours on the phone with AT&#038;T and several angry voicemails to the company&#8217;s president&#8217;s secretary, I give up.
</li>
<li>A month later, I receive my bill for my first month of service, even though I was supposed to get my first month free.  It takes me three separate phone calls to finally find someone competent enough to make it go away.</li>
</ol>
<p>For the following few months, the service actually seemed to be doing okay.</p>
<p>Fast forward to these past couple weeks.  My internet speed has been seeming a bit slow, which is especially noticeable since I use VOIP for my telephones and use YouTube quite a bit.  I thought I might just upgrade to the next speed level, but I decided to first do a speed test, at which point I noticed that my internet was running significantly slower than when my service was finally activated.</p>
<p>Having learned my lesson from calling phone support, I decided to do a live chat instead.</p>
<p>After convincing the representative that I am, in fact, NOT an idiot and that the problem is not my browser or that my modem needs to be reset, I finally persuaded her to make a support ticket.  However, she then told me that there might be fees involved.  Fees, for them to fix their problem?  I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>I think we finally reached an agreement about that, but if I get charged anything for them fixing their congested lines so my connection doesn&#8217;t crawl, I&#8217;m out.  Not that they&#8217;ll really care anyways.  But still, no legitimate company charges me to fix their own problems, wastes hours of my time, and gives me unnecessary stress and headaches.  Maybe it&#8217;s time to start looking for a real one.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
digg_url = 'http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/25/att-possibly-the-worst-company-ever/';
</script><br />
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/25/att-possibly-the-worst-company-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! Superb Phone Support</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/18/yahoo-superb-phone-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/18/yahoo-superb-phone-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
I just got off the phone with a Yahoo! telephone support representative on behalf of one of my clients who is experiencing some issues with a compromised account.  I was quite impressed with the friendliness and helpfulness of the representative.  Maybe there&#8217;s hope for customer support after all.
This individual was experiencing the &#8220;New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F03%2F18%2Fyahoo-superb-phone-support%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2009%2F03%2F18%2Fyahoo-superb-phone-support%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I just got off the phone with a Yahoo! telephone support representative on behalf of one of my clients who is experiencing some issues with a compromised account.  I was quite impressed with the friendliness and helpfulness of the representative.  Maybe there&#8217;s hope for customer support after all.</p>
<p>This individual was experiencing <a href="http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/02/08/how-to-fix-the-new-shopping-new-life-virus/">the &#8220;New shopping new life!&#8221; virus I wrote about a few weeks ago</a>.  It seems that this issue affects Yahoo a bit more deeply than it does Gmail, and can even wipe out a user&#8217;s contacts.</p>
<p>The representative told me that for issues of a compromised account, the best solution is to call the toll-free support hotline.  If you are a Yahoo! user and are having problems resolving the &#8220;New shopping new life!&#8221; &#8216;virus&#8217; or have been locked out of your account, the number to call is: 1-866-562-7219.  </p>
<p>Hopefully, they will be as kind and helpful to you as they were towards me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/18/yahoo-superb-phone-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
