<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The &#34;C&#34; Branch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecbranch.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecbranch.com</link>
	<description>Chris DeMarco&#039;s Blog and Internet Sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Emailing AT&amp;T Leads to a Cease and Desist Letter</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/06/03/emailing-att-leads-to-a-cease-and-desist-letter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/06/03/emailing-att-leads-to-a-cease-and-desist-letter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at and t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t is the worst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atandt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att cease and decist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att cease and desist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att legal department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cease and desist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
It&#8217;s no secret that I really, really, REALLY hate AT&#038;T.  In case you have any doubts, feel freed to read AT&#038;T: Possibly the Worst Company Ever.  It&#8217;s true, I hate them.
That said, I guess it&#8217;s very good I happened to catch this in recent news: an AT&#038;T customer recently received a phone call [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F06%2F03%2Femailing-att-leads-to-a-cease-and-desist-letter%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F06%2F03%2Femailing-att-leads-to-a-cease-and-desist-letter%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>It&#8217;s no secret that I really, really, REALLY hate AT&#038;T.  In case you have any doubts, feel freed to read <a target="_blank" href="http://www.thecbranch.com/2009/03/25/att-possibly-the-worst-company-ever/">AT&#038;T: Possibly the Worst Company Ever</a>.  It&#8217;s true, I hate them.</p>
<p>That said, I guess it&#8217;s very good I happened to catch this in recent news: an AT&#038;T customer recently received a phone call from AT&#038;T&#8217;s legal department, warning him that he was on the fast track to receiving a &#8220;Cease &#038; Desist&#8221; letter from the department.  Why?  He wrote two emails to Randall Stephenson, AT&#038;T&#8217;s CEO, regarding legitimate customer concerns.</p>
<p>I guess this just continues to go to show that AT&#038;T has absolutely no interest in actually addressing its customers&#8217; problems and needs and is solely out to make a profit while irritating as many people like me as possible.  Oh well.  At least I know not to ever bother writing the CEO.</p>
<p>You can read more at this <a target="_blank" href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/atandt-warns-customer-that-emailing-the-ceo-will-result-in-a-cease/">Endgadget Article</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/06/03/emailing-att-leads-to-a-cease-and-desist-letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Butterflies May Prevent Forged Currency</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/05/30/butterflies-may-prevent-forged-currency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/05/30/butterflies-may-prevent-forged-currency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 18:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[butterflies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[butterfly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[butterfly encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[butterfly wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[currency forgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forgery prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevent forgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
According to a Daily Mail report, researchers at Cambridge University have discovered a way to duplicate some of the intricate optical signatures found in butterfly wings for use as an encryption method.  This complex structure found in butterfly wings allows butterflies to appear one color to other butterflies, but a different color to their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F05%2F30%2Fbutterflies-may-prevent-forged-currency%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F05%2F30%2Fbutterflies-may-prevent-forged-currency%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>According to a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1282621/Butterfly-wings-make-bank-notes-impossible-forge.html">Daily Mail report</a>, researchers at Cambridge University have discovered a way to duplicate some of the intricate optical signatures found in butterfly wings for use as an encryption method.  This complex structure found in butterfly wings allows butterflies to appear one color to other butterflies, but a different color to their predators and other species.  By recreating this technology, scientists have been able to produce optical signatures that change color based on how they are viewed.</p>
<p>One practical use of this new technology is to help deter the forgery of documents such as bank notes.  Due to its high complexity and difficulty to reproduce, the use of this technology would make it much more challenging for counterfeiters to forge documents that utilize it as an anti-duplication measure.</p>
<p>Essentially, the optical signature would cause marking(s) on the document to change appearance when viewed under different lighting conditions.</p>
<p>For the original article, please visit <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1282621/Butterfly-wings-make-bank-notes-impossible-forge.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1282621/Butterfly-wings-make-bank-notes-impossible-forge.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/05/30/butterflies-may-prevent-forged-currency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Actually, the Gmail Mute Feature Looks Legit</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/04/01/actually-the-gmail-mute-feature-looks-legit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/04/01/actually-the-gmail-mute-feature-looks-legit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email muting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail mute feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail muting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mute gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
From Gmail help:
If you&#8217;re subscribed to a mailing list, you&#8217;ve no doubt been subjected to the &#8216;thread that just won&#8217;t die!&#8217; If you&#8217;re part of a long message conversation that isn&#8217;t relevant, you can &#8216;mute&#8217; the conversation to keep all future additions out of your inbox.
Very interesting&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F04%2F01%2Factually-the-gmail-mute-feature-looks-legit%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F04%2F01%2Factually-the-gmail-mute-feature-looks-legit%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>From Gmail help:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you&#8217;re subscribed to a mailing list, you&#8217;ve no doubt been subjected to the &#8216;thread that just won&#8217;t die!&#8217; If you&#8217;re part of a long message conversation that isn&#8217;t relevant, you can &#8216;mute&#8217; the conversation to keep all future additions out of your inbox.</p></blockquote>
<p>Very interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/04/01/actually-the-gmail-mute-feature-looks-legit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Mute Option?</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/04/01/gmail-mute-option/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/04/01/gmail-mute-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail mute button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail mute option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more options mute gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mute gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
I just noticed a &#8220;Mute&#8221; option in my Gmail menu.  Considering I have no idea how you would mute an email, I&#8217;m guessing this is another April Fool&#8217;s Day joke.  Does anyone have this?  Or perhaps know anything about it?

On second thought, maybe this is legit&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F04%2F01%2Fgmail-mute-option%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F04%2F01%2Fgmail-mute-option%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I just noticed a &#8220;Mute&#8221; option in my Gmail menu.  Considering I have no idea how you would mute an email, I&#8217;m guessing this is another April Fool&#8217;s Day joke.  Does anyone have this?  Or perhaps know anything about it?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.thecbranch.com/images/gmail-more-actions-mute-button.png"></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/04/01/actually-the-gmail-mute-feature-looks-legit/">On second thought, maybe this is legit&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/04/01/gmail-mute-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Changes Name to Topeka</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/04/01/google-changes-name-to-topeka/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/04/01/google-changes-name-to-topeka/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google change name to topeka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google changes its name to topeka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google is now topeka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google topeka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topeka google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		

If you visit Google.com or drive through Kansas today, you may notice something different.  Early last month the mayor of Topeka, Kansas stunned the world by announcing that his city was changing its name to Google.  [Source: CNN]
As it turns out, the former Google felt so honored by this that the company decided [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F04%2F01%2Fgoogle-changes-name-to-topeka%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F04%2F01%2Fgoogle-changes-name-to-topeka%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src="http://thecbranch.com/images/topeka-hp.gif" align="left"></p>
<p>If you visit Google.com or drive through Kansas today, you may notice something different.  Early last month the mayor of Topeka, Kansas stunned the world by announcing that his city was changing its name to Google.  <a target="_blank" href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/03/02/google.kansas.topeka/index.html">[Source: CNN]</a></p>
<p>As it turns out, the former Google felt so honored by this that the company decided to change its name to Topeka.  If you don&#8217;t believe this, simply visit Google.com or take a look at the <a target="_blank" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/different-kind-of-company-name.html">Official Google Blog</a> and see for yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/04/01/google-changes-name-to-topeka/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Divine Providence?</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/17/what-is-divine-providence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/17/what-is-divine-providence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divine providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is divine intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is divine providence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
A nice young lady looking for help with a Social Studies project asked for help with this today, so here&#8217;s a little explanation of divine providence.
Divine Providence essentially refers to God&#8217;s activity and intervention in the world and in people&#8217;s lives.  It can be and has been used &#8211; and abused &#8211; as an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F02%2F17%2Fwhat-is-divine-providence%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F02%2F17%2Fwhat-is-divine-providence%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>A nice young lady looking for help with a Social Studies project asked for help with this today, so here&#8217;s a little explanation of <strong>divine providence</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Divine Providence</strong> essentially refers to God&#8217;s activity and intervention in the world and in people&#8217;s lives.  It can be and has been used &#8211; and abused &#8211; as an explanation or justification for just about anything &#8211; good or bad.</p>
<p>For example, many ancient rulers (and the civilizations which they governed) took the very fact that they were in power to mean that God willed for that to be. Therefore, this allowed them to get away with doing lots of stuff that may or may not have necessarily been good &#8211; but people accepted it as &#8220;fate&#8221; because God allowed that person to be in power, so therefore everything that was happening must be the will of God.</p>
<p>In fact, everything from the rise and fall of nations and the outcomes of battles and wars to explanations for droughts and famine has been and continues even to this day to be associated with the will and action of God.</p>
<p>This philosophy applies on a much smaller scale as well &#8211; and can be attributed to &#8220;fate&#8221; or &#8220;karma&#8221; too.  In fact, you probably experience it on a daily basis without even realizing it.  </p>
<p>For example, if something bad happens to someone and you overhear someone say &#8220;he/she had it coming,&#8221; they are expressing this very concept &#8211; that some higher power (karma, or the universe, or God) had some sort of intervention on that event taking place.  And, every single day, millions of believers in God (including myself) attribute good things happening to God&#8217;s mercy and power.</p>
<p>Hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/17/what-is-divine-providence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC to Mandate Minimum Broadband Speeds</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/17/fcc-to-mandate-minimum-broadband-speeds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/17/fcc-to-mandate-minimum-broadband-speeds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Unfortunately, most of the times the FCC or other areas of the US Government are mentioned on this blog with regards to the internet, it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re stirring up some sort of net neutrality outrage or some other problem.
Today, however, I have some interesting and more positive news.  While it may be a bit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F02%2F17%2Ffcc-to-mandate-minimum-broadband-speeds%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F02%2F17%2Ffcc-to-mandate-minimum-broadband-speeds%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Unfortunately, most of the times the FCC or other areas of the US Government are mentioned on this blog with regards to the internet, it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re stirring up some sort of net neutrality outrage or some other problem.</p>
<p>Today, however, I have some interesting and more positive news.  While it may be a bit unrealistic of a goal, the FCC has announced a plan to require a minimum speed for residential broadband providers.  </p>
<p><span id="more-610"></span></p>
<p>Industry analysts estimate the current average residential broadband connection to be under 4 MBPS.  However, the FCC&#8217;s new proposal could potentially require home internet speeds of 100 MBPS only 10 years from now.</p>
<p>Many broadband providers were quick to push back, claiming the plan is unrealistic, unnecessary, and not affordable.  However, larger and more competent internet companies seemed somewhat more receptive.</p>
<p>You can get the whole scoop here: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61F3GY20100216">FCC to Propose Faster Broadband Speeds</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/17/fcc-to-mandate-minimum-broadband-speeds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogger to No Longer Support FTP</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/04/blogger-to-no-longer-support-ftp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/04/blogger-to-no-longer-support-ftp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger discontinuing ftp support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger ftp publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger ftp support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger layout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger on the go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger outreach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger spot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edit blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech geek blogger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Blogger is discontinuing its FTP publishing feature in March 2010.
The other day, Blogger sent out an official email to all its users announcing that they will be discontinuing support for FTP publishing quite soon:
&#8230;we are announcing today that we will no longer support FTP publishing in Blogger after March 26, 2010. We realize that this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fblogger-to-no-longer-support-ftp%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F02%2F04%2Fblogger-to-no-longer-support-ftp%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<h2>Blogger is discontinuing its FTP publishing feature in March 2010.</h2>
<p>The other day, Blogger sent out an official email to all its users announcing that they will be discontinuing support for FTP publishing quite soon:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;we are announcing today that we will no longer support FTP publishing in Blogger after March 26, 2010. We realize that this will not necessarily be welcome news for some users, and we are committed to making the transition as seamless as possible. To that end:</p>
<ul>
<li>We are building a migration tool that will walk users through a migration from their current URL to a Blogger-managed URL (either a Custom Domain or a Blogspot URL) that will be available to all users the week of February 22. This tool will handle redirecting traffic from the old URL to the new URL, and will handle the vast majority of situations.
<li>We will be providing a dedicated blog[5] and help documentation
<li>Blogger team members will also be available to answer questions on the forum, comments on the blog, and in a few scheduled conference calls once the tool is released.
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Blogger claims that it is a big drain on resources to provide the functionality, and further, that it would require rewriting all of the feature&#8217;s code to accommodate a new system they are moving to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/04/blogger-to-no-longer-support-ftp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google IE6 Phase-Out Confirmed</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/01/google-ie6-phase-out-confirmed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/01/google-ie6-phase-out-confirmed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer 6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
To confirm all the rumors about Google phasing out Internet Explorer 6, I got this email only a few hours ago:
Dear Google Apps admin,
In order to continue to improve our products and deliver more sophisticated features and performance, we are harnessing some of the latest improvements in web browser technology.  This includes faster JavaScript [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F02%2F01%2Fgoogle-ie6-phase-out-confirmed%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F02%2F01%2Fgoogle-ie6-phase-out-confirmed%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>To confirm all the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/01/31/google-officially-phasing-out-ie6/">rumors about Google phasing out Internet Explorer 6</a>, I got this email only a few hours ago:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dear Google Apps admin,</p>
<p>In order to continue to improve our products and deliver more sophisticated features and performance, we are harnessing some of the latest improvements in web browser technology.  This includes faster JavaScript processing and new standards like HTML5.  As a result, over the course of 2010, we will be phasing out support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 as well as other older browsers that are not supported by their own manufacturers.</p>
<p>We plan to begin phasing out support of these older browsers on the Google Docs suite and the Google Sites editor on March 1, 2010.  After that point, certain functionality within these applications may have higher latency and may not work correctly in these older browsers. Later in 2010, we will start to phase out support for these browsers for Google Mail and Google Calendar.</p>
<p>Google Apps will continue to support Internet Explorer 7.0 and above, Firefox 3.0 and above, Google Chrome 4.0 and above, and Safari 3.0 and above.</p>
<p>Starting this week, users on these older browsers will see a message in Google Docs and the Google Sites editor explaining this change and asking them to upgrade their browser.  We will also alert you again closer to March 1 to remind you of this change.</p>
<p>In 2009, the Google Apps team delivered more than 100 improvements to enhance your product experience.  We are aiming to beat that in 2010 and continue to deliver the best and most innovative collaboration products for businesses.</p>
<p>Thank you for your continued support!</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>The Google Apps team</p></blockquote>
<p>I guess that settles it!  By the end of the year, all of Google Apps will no longer support IE6.  I like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/02/01/google-ie6-phase-out-confirmed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Officially Phasing Out IE6</title>
		<link>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/01/31/google-officially-phasing-out-ie6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/01/31/google-officially-phasing-out-ie6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris DeMarco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6 support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phase out ie6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecbranch.com/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Much to the annoyance of most web developers, IE6 has continued to hold a surprisingly high share of the browser market, even following the releases of Internet Explorer 7 and 8.  Consequently, of course, we&#8217;ve been forced to spend hours testing and tweaking our designs &#8211; fighting with the outdated browser&#8217;s horrible incompatibility and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 15px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F01%2F31%2Fgoogle-officially-phasing-out-ie6%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecbranch.com%2F2010%2F01%2F31%2Fgoogle-officially-phasing-out-ie6%2F&amp;source=chrisdemarco&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Much to the annoyance of most web developers, IE6 has continued to hold a surprisingly high share of the browser market, even following the releases of Internet Explorer 7 and 8.  Consequently, of course, we&#8217;ve been forced to spend hours testing and tweaking our designs &#8211; fighting with the outdated browser&#8217;s horrible incompatibility and lack of standards compliance &#8211; to make websites display properly in the archaic browser, often having to break standards to do so.</p>
<p>This is, of course, in addition to the terrible security concerns the horribly out-of-date browser presents.</p>
<p>Well, a recent announcement by Google may finally shed some hope on this situation.  Google has announced that as of the first of March, its Google Docs service will &#8220;no longer work properly&#8221; on IE6.  In other words, Google is no longer going to waste its time doing a ton of extra work tweaking its software to make it work on IE6 while it works every other browser just fine.</p>
<p>Hopefully such a substantial move by an authority as big as Google will finally prompt a transition away from support for the old browser on the internet in general.  If that&#8217;s the case, it would mean a lot of long-overdue relief for web developers everywhere.</p>
<p>You can learn more at this BBC News story: <a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8488751.stm">Google phases out support for IE6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecbranch.com/2010/01/31/google-officially-phasing-out-ie6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
